(<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/larachris/223220197/" target="_blank">larachris</a>/flickr)
(larachris/flickr)

Giving Pause

October 12, 2007

We all use filler words like um or uh but it’s rare that we hear them in movies, news broadcasts or … uh … this show. Author Michael Erard explains that verbal blunders and hesitations reveal more than we think.


Listener Comments Leave a Comment | Refresh Comments
[1]
Posted by: David Rowe
October 13, 2007 - 05:17PM
Princeton, NJ

I was waiting to see if OTM would do a story on how PBS over-inflated the ratings for The War and interview the ombudsmen that nailed them on it... but no... we get a segment on the word "um" which OTM religiously cleanses (unless its from the lips of Bush).

Ugh.

[2]
Posted by: jonny goldstein
October 14, 2007 - 10:15AM
Washington DC

I would love it if you put up an alternate version of this with the um's left in. Then we could listen to both and see which we prefer.

[3]
Posted by: Joyce
October 15, 2007 - 10:02AM
Chicago

1 in 10 words is a slip? That's a lot!

[4]
Posted by: Gary Shea
October 16, 2007 - 08:14AM
Bayside WI

Hmmm.

[5]
Posted by: RJacob Watson
October 17, 2007 - 02:02PM
Colfax, WA 99111

How about our illustrious Sec. of State Condi Rice, um, seems to, um, continually, um, stammers, um, uh, working to make, um, her, um, point.

[6]
Posted by: Doug Benson
April 10, 2008 - 04:27PM
WA

Why does the media require the use of so many filler words?

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments on On the Media are moderated. On the Media reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the onthemedia.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode
Supported in part by: